The Torygraph reports:
Benedict XVI said it was “deeply moving” to recall the sacrifices made by Britons during the Second World War and paid particular tribute to nearby Coventry, which was heavily bombed during the Battle of Britain 70 years ago.[snip]
His words were particularly significant given controversy over his own wartime record. As a 14 year-old growing up in Germany, the then Joseph Ratzinger was drafted into the Hitler Youth and later enlisted in the anti-aircraft corps.
I felt badly for all concerned when I read that. I realize there's some justice in forcing the Pope to cringe and pander. His record since his Hitler Youth days has been none too pretty. There's also some justice in his choice of pandering topic.
Basil: So! It's all forgotten now, and let's hear no more about it. So, that's two egg mayonnaise, a prawn Goebbels, a Hermann Goering, and four Colditz salads.Basil: Is there something wrong?
Elder Herr: Will you stop talking about the war?
Basil: Me! You started it!
Elder Herr: We did not start it!
Basil: Yes you did — you invaded Poland.
A little comic relief can go a long way to easing tensions, but the essential problem remains the same. The Church hierarchy continues in its efforts to exercise a proprietary control over the religious experience and continues to act as an extension of the state, regardless of the immorality of the state's functions. There was a chance for reform when the liberation theologians were a force, but the Pope helped squash that too.
It's extraordinarily difficult to recruit for a true vocation when the institutional purpose is the preservation of the institution, and the purpose is pursued regardless of the harms that come to others. So it's something of a miracle, if you will, that there are any good priests at all.
Comments (23)
Why an extension of the state? Why not a vehicle of the status quo? Seems to me the state belongs to the investing classes, as do the various and sundry churches, as they continue enacting their diversionary function.
Posted by Michael Dawson | September 19, 2010 2:31 PM
Posted on September 19, 2010 14:31
if we look at nazi germany we indeed see a catholic hierarchy collaborating in the most supine fashion with the "state machine"
i think the chuirch hierarchy's
independent existence is provisional and conditional ...inside any one state system
over 10 centuries
the church hierarchy has evolved
elaborate means to co exist with its host states
yes there have been
" moments " of struggle and collaboration
there has been
both victory and capitulation
regimes over thrown
and hierarchies dumped in the ditch
antagonist independence and utter submission
despite not one division north of what
Romagna ???
hey the pope has been deposed several times
and multiply popes too
and yet the hierarchy always reconsolidates
like a good slime will
------------
as to tilts left or right
its fair to say
even if unfair to say to my domestic partner
that the church hierarchy
in post war soviet dominated hungary or poland
was far more resistent to state dictate
then under those same nation's
pre war "fascist /proto fascist " regimes
Posted by op | September 19, 2010 3:38 PM
Posted on September 19, 2010 15:38
"the state belongs to the investing classes, as do the various and sundry churches"
the "ownership of catholic churches
" in the pheeeesical sense "
is not really that cut and dried
church property rights vary greatly
from nation to nation
but it's safe to say the church in rome
the vatican owns most if not all
of itself or claims to
and the church and the various orders
own
themselves or claim to
in most host nations
the hierarchy owns this to be clear about it
the church laity owns nothing
the congregation owns not its house of worship
t'ain't no damn private country club for christ sake
Posted by op | September 19, 2010 3:44 PM
Posted on September 19, 2010 15:44
i love the church of rome
precisely because its not
in its genes a bourgeois institution
not by any means
it has adapted to bourgeois hegemony
embraced it but not "moiged " with it
the hierarchies profoundly anti democratic anti egalitarian essence
is less compromised then anything
worth a shit on this god foresaken planet
outside the arabian peninsula
Posted by op | September 19, 2010 3:51 PM
Posted on September 19, 2010 15:51
"Controversy", schmontroversy. The guy was fourteen.
What is it with liberals and the Catholic Church? It drives 'em crazy. You've gotta love that. And I also like the way it quietly goes on believing, and acting, as if it stands to some degree outside the sphere of the secular Zweckrational bourgeois state.
Posted by MJS | September 20, 2010 4:12 PM
Posted on September 20, 2010 16:12
"...it quietly goes on believing, and acting, as if it stands to some degree outside the sphere of the secular Zweckrational bourgeois state. "
The Church to survive
must perform daily and on a mass scale
the crude art of hypocrisy
steadfastly and with a swallowed levity
Posted by op | September 20, 2010 5:11 PM
Posted on September 20, 2010 17:11
i know i know
nothing escapes devouring
by the hegemonic class
bt its romantic nonsense
like for a brief moment
supposing so
that brings the occasional
spring to my step
Posted by op | September 20, 2010 5:16 PM
Posted on September 20, 2010 17:16
Fr Smith:
What is it with liberals and the Catholic Church?
1) Abortion is the first objection, liberals think abortion-as-birth-control is preferable to the rhythm method. Liberals like the fact that a fetus generated by a drunken, regrettable fuck can be erased with an abortion. It's a choice, not a human fetus!
2) Jesuit education is the second objection, liberals hate that the RC church's educational wing (them Papal Marines) has high academic standards that yield students who actually can think circles around Haaahvaaahd meritocrats. While Yale Law School has no grades, the Jesuits have that whacky 96.5-100.0 A that is unattainable for most.
3) General religion is the third objection, liberals love the atheistic stance almost as much as they love hating Christians, and since the RC church is ostensibly Xtian... well, there you go.
4) That pedophilia thing. Truly a black mark on the Papists, can't argue with the libbies here.
Posted by CF Oxtrot | September 20, 2010 10:06 PM
Posted on September 20, 2010 22:06
oxy u surprise me
what a depraved seedy old prig u are
and the church as educateeerrs
in particular jesuit higher education....???
surely you gest
all they teach is ....
spulling
penmanship
sums by nuns
and after too many years of that
casuistry
producing except by revulsion
letter perfect deceeeeetful reactionaries
pre 20th century gay clerks
and
drunken cynical lawyers
Posted by op | September 21, 2010 7:40 AM
Posted on September 21, 2010 07:40
drunken in past lives, now floating along on medical cannabis.
from what I hear, anyway.
Posted by CF Oxtrot | September 21, 2010 10:12 AM
Posted on September 21, 2010 10:12
I had Jesuit, Dominican, Franciscan and Xaverian educators, OP. I certainly learned a lot more than "penmanship."
Sure, we had to go to Mass a lot - but I learned evolutionary theory that wasn't treated as controversial by the nuns and other Catty teachersl and it sure as hell was (and still is) in the publik skool.
The Vatican hides a host of evil behind its frocks and man dresses - but Catty education is worlds better than publicly tampered-with skoolhus kind.
Posted by Jack Crow | September 21, 2010 12:10 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 12:10
jack
"Sure, we had to go to Mass a lot - but I learned evolutionary theory that wasn't treated as controversial by the nuns and other Catty teachers "
are you serious jacko ???
darwin scoffed in pub ed
big deal
not an outrage !!!!
speaking of mass
lets go over that wafer bit
surely it's no less poisonous then intelligent design ...eh ??
Posted by op | September 21, 2010 1:00 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 13:00
we paine's were all
once
terribly firece deists don't you know
Posted by op | September 21, 2010 1:04 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 13:04
Lefties ought to wander into a Mass sometime. They'll actually encounter members of the working class. That is if those lefties can tear themselves away from the blathersphere or "lefty mailing lists."
Posted by Geoff | September 21, 2010 3:14 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 15:14
MJS, I'm not sure what sets liberals off when it comes to the Church. Sometimes they like it. Sometimes they don't. Both like and dislike correspond to the perceived good/harm it's doing for Democratic chances. None of the like or dislike has anything to do with the faithful themselves, except insofar as they're perceived to be at the bidding of church hierarchy, which is where liberals focus. There's no other consistent standard involved.
The Catholic presence in pro-labor and anti-war movements is alternately praised and dismissed, again depending on perceived utility to Democrats. Sometimes there's a tear shed for the crushed Liberation Theology movements, but that's the same kind of nostalgia that JFK gets.
My own animus towards the Church comes from the same bitter disgust I have for any institutional elite that trivializes and traduces the moral convictions and struggles of people who actually believe, strongly, that cruelty is wrong.
Posted by Al Schumann | September 21, 2010 3:58 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 15:58
geof
u often make dumb self serving assumptions
go to mass
to
meet working class folks ???
why there
when
they're everywhere we who have a mcjob
go to mcjobble
is it your belief
pwoggie-left views
melt away under
the gaze of honest wage earning eyes
whatabout u makes your living for u btw ???
Posted by op | September 21, 2010 4:19 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 16:19
Owen, it's my belief that the left is so pathetically removed from the working class as not to be in the same hemisphere, nor on the same planet. It's a joke. It's a cartoon. And it has been this way for decades. Elite, educated lefties have long, involved, brow-furrowing debates and discussions among themselves with nary a prole in sight, except maybe to refill the latte cups.
How many coal miners or truck drivers are on any "lefty mailing lists"? Hmmm. Bet it'll take a while to do a headcount.
I went to a lefty college. (Any other kind?) It was situated in one of the poorest counties in the USA. The "democratic socialists" used to huddle in a tiny office in the student union. They'd even sing the Internationale once in a while, fresh off of viewing Warren Beatty's picture on Reed.
But did they ever venture out of the cozy campus confines and try to lift a finger for the poor and the underpaid, exploited denizens of the desperately impoverished county where their little cell would meet? Hah! What a joke!
Posted by Geoff | September 21, 2010 4:45 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 16:45
"But did they ever venture out of the cozy campus confines and try to lift a finger for the poor and the underpaid, exploited denizens of the desperately impoverished county where their little cell would meet?"
What would you have recommended in the way of finger lifting?
Posted by Boink, Missionary to the Working Class | September 21, 2010 5:06 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 17:06
The feckless-elitist-nerdly-trustarian-college-lefty trope always makes an appearance around election time. The cue for it comes in August. By November it will reach a peak. If the Democrats lose, the partisans demonize the lefties who refused to play along with the One True Hope of the working class, the Democratic Party.
If the Democrats win, the partisans agonize about the continued strength of the Republicans—until it's time to fret about the feckless-elitist-nerdly-trustarian-college-lefties again. The demonization is borrowed from the Republicans, who invented the trope back in the sixties.
The narrowness of the Democrats' little game is best viewed as the resentment of an embattled managerial class, with factions that are desperate not to give an entirely meaningless satisfaction to the Republican managerial factions they don't like.
Posted by Al Schumann | September 21, 2010 5:59 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 17:59
Owen,
The science and mathematics education in Cat schools is not subject to public whim tampering - is my point. It gets taught with an eye to absorption.
Sure, I was introduced to Teilhard De Chardin and the life of the Poor Claires, whether or not I wanted to learn about them.
But, Charles' original point really hasn't been disproved. The Catty education is far more rigorous, even with (and probably, because) of all the doctrinal mythopoetics.
Now - if you don't think rigorous education is a good thing (there's an argument there), that's another matter.
Respect,
Jack
*
Al,
"My own animus towards the Church comes from the same bitter disgust I have for any institutional elite that trivializes and traduces the moral convictions and struggles of people who actually believe, strongly, that cruelty is wrong."
Well said. As I mentioned before, I know a lot of really admirable orders and lay Catholics - who do good works within the superstructure of a monstrous edifice of rape, degradation, organized crime and women-hating, self-destructive cryptohomosexuality.
The Vatican isn't going away, so whatchagonnado?
Full disclosure - a younger brother teaches history in a New York area Catholic school. His opinions color mine - he's taught in both public and parochial schools, and prefers the Catholic system, since he doesn't have to divide fealty between two dozen administrators and the private fiefs of department heads.
Respect,
Jack
Respect,
Jack
Posted by Jack Crow | September 21, 2010 6:33 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 18:33
op, I'm still laughing at "depraved seedy old prig."
Since my work provides daily interaction with middle school students, I have to agree that I'm much more like the old dude yelling at neighborhood kids to get off his lawn, than I am a Modern Hipster. Or Leftist. Not only can I not understand the 12-year-old's predilection for sexting (complete with photo), I also can't defend it like any good Modern Leftist Hipster could or would defend it as "healthy sexuality" or whatever. I can't say I disagree with the RC church on abortion (I see it as human life, not a "choice"), though I do disagree with it on contraception. Probably that's because I have no mission to increase my flock, so I have no interest in rapid population expansion through that rhythm method assurance of lots of pregnancies.
While I have met some truly screwed up priests in my time, none was a Jesuit; and the best teacher I've ever known was a Jesuit -- although the 2s best teacher was a cattle rancher who had no use for God.
The Jesuits fixed my slacker tendencies, and I thank them for that. They also gave me the tools to intellectually make fools of Hivey Leeg stuffed-shirt self-impressed asswipe lawyers who imagined their fancy parchment meant non-stop victory in jurisprudential contests.
Though I guess the Hivies have the "last laugh" on me with their secret-handshake-society yielding bigger incomes for less actual work. I guess they win that one. I mean, their House Negro is in the Whitest House in America right now!
Posted by CF Oxtrot | September 21, 2010 8:01 PM
Posted on September 21, 2010 20:01
What is it with liberals and the Catholic Church?
I see nothing wrong with liberal hostility to the Catholic Church. It's usually warranted. My question is what is it about the Church that bothers liberals that doesn't bother them about the D-Party, academia or our sainted medical profession, which is our unofficial secular priesthood? All these institutions service the interests of the elite to varying degrees, but I doubt the Holy Ghost surgeons have amassed quite the body count of late that the American medical profession has, nor do they enjoy such unquestioning faith. Nobody's forcing you to go to church, but thanks to the Pope of Hope you are now forced to pray and pay at the altar of Big Med.
Posted by Sean | September 22, 2010 7:18 PM
Posted on September 22, 2010 19:18
Sean -- you have stated my case better than I did.
Posted by MJS | September 22, 2010 11:24 PM
Posted on September 22, 2010 23:24