"Leave aside whether you are liberal or conservative... It’s hard to dispute: Congress just got a lot more done in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s than in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s.The guy's amazing. From 1938 to 1964 this fine old seniority system essentially froze up "solid south", as they say, except when confronting anything foreign or colored they had a notion to terrorize bully or plain kill -- oh yeah, and subsidize huge piles of grown crap in every district in America and build big superhighways between 'em. That was about the sum of it for over 25 years.Why?
You hear many grand, sweeping explanations. Let’s try just one simple one.
Congress in the first period was controlled by a handful of committee chairmen, who owed their positions to seniority. The committees did their work in secret. Bills written in committee typically could not be amended on the floor of Congress. The institution was authoritarian, hierarchical, opaque. And stuff passed.
In the mid-1970s, Congress underwent a revolution. The power of the committee chairmen was broken. The number of subcommittees proliferated. The committees met in public. Amendments multiplied. Congress become more open, more egalitarian, more responsive. And stuff ceased to pass...
Once upon a time, members of Congress did their business mostly in secret. They struck quiet deals with each other. A Republican might support a Democratic labor measure in return for some discreet help with a farm bill.
Today, everything happens in the bright glare of sunshine, policed by hundreds of ideological interest groups. Deviate one step from the party line, and you are a traitor, a sell-out, an enemy."
"Son, we done our duty: we kept the flag flyin' and the darkies down."
Comments (7)
I heard comments weren't working here....
Posted by MJS | March 2, 2010 10:39 PM
Posted on March 2, 2010 22:39
Frum is right about this. The period he valorizes was also the golden age of the white working class (so far) and the period in which the black underclass found its political feet. The solid south was doomed by WWII.
Today we have corporate governance that is directed as much from a Laputa as the finance industry's Laputa.
Hit me big guy.
Posted by Flak | March 2, 2010 10:56 PM
Posted on March 2, 2010 22:56
MJS, I meant the previous one. Sorry. I hadn't checked back.
Posted by Al Schumann | March 2, 2010 11:29 PM
Posted on March 2, 2010 23:29
>>when confronting anything foreign or colored they had a notion to terrorize bully or plain kill
Isn't that what they're still doing?
And the pork is still doing well, too, especially when it comes to the military industrial complex.
The shouting and the posturing is all for show, friends, it's Kabuki.
Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
Posted by Carolyn Kay | March 3, 2010 5:48 AM
Posted on March 3, 2010 05:48
Flakster:
we are of course talking domestic movements here eh ??
note his examples
the white hat external motions
--such as they are --
do not always or even often
strictly line up in sync with domestic reforms ...obviously
the blue collar "golden age"
was a product of a fairly sizeable restructuring accomplished
by the raft of institutional reforms
known as the new deal ... eh ???
none of this restructuring occured between 46 and 64
the golden era itself
this post is about one institution
that didn't reform itself before or during
the golden era ...the congress
and how that two chambered body
put a hammer lock on social progress
til lbj used the kennedy martyrdom to push thru another .. wave of reforms
that indeed catalyzed our minority and "identity " liberations
of the 60's and 70's
recap:
roosevelt reform wave parts post
13-15 impasse in 33-36
--more or less--
johnson reform wave reparts impasse 64-66
--more or less--
before between and after
the center aisle sea
reclosed over the land of liberty
now frummy here alludes to the self reform of the congress after the nixon debacle :
rule and means changes
that yielded
.......nothing substantive
true enough
but hardly a tribute to the
age old CAS ( center aisle stymie) game
that prevailed apres the tricky D deluge
i note the spurious formalistic internal "reform wave " of the post 74 congress paralleled a series of gestures aimed at curbing the imperial presidency
they have failed magnificently no ???
the present attack on the 60 rule if successful
will end up i suspect
yet another example of form trumping substance call it kabuki reforms
ala the ardent M kay
if the congress "must" really act
it will act
by one means or other
with or without the 60 rulle
it isn't a bar it's an alibi
the congress can be as nimble graceful and swift
as a dancing master when necessary
--note the bank bails --
then return to its habitual CAS condition once more
like a sleeping barabarossa awaiting the next call to "action "
as to congresses with real protracted prolific tenures of activity
among all of our 110 or so congresses
they can prolly be counted
on two hands
seem slight yield wise
i'd suggest u take that up with cleo
not the constitutional authors and amenders
form follows function
and function follows the motions
of the class plates
lemma
many forms => similar functions
same plate motions => functionally similar forms
Posted by op | March 3, 2010 7:50 AM
Posted on March 3, 2010 07:50
i'm the Red Buttons of smbiva
"never get a comment "
unless i write it myself
or beg for em
like now
errr like some gut blasted
tudor
conny catcher
Posted by op | March 3, 2010 9:41 AM
Posted on March 3, 2010 09:41
"The solid south was doomed by WWII"
dear soul
that removes the need for agency
and the blood
that trickles down
the cheek of change
Posted by op | March 3, 2010 9:44 AM
Posted on March 3, 2010 09:44