No, of course I don't mean these Supremes; to their judgement I would happily submit. I strongly suspect they would be more than just; they would find me guilty, guilty, guilty, and then let me off with a warning.
The Supremes I mean, of course, are those nine fancy-dress mountebanks in Washington: the Supremely Silly Court. I've been pondering all day why people insist on taking this institution so seriously, and wondering why it makes me so mad when they do.
Of course it's the last-ditch defense of the contemptible Democrats: Dems might appoint Dracula to the Court, but Republicans would appoint Cthulhu. Aieee!
But it goes deeper. This carefully cultivated fear of pantomime villains enrages me, in part at least, because it seems unmanly.
I realize this is a dated term, and of course we need to redefine it in a way that does justice to the manliness of women, generally so much greater -- if less demonstrative -- than the manliness of men.
Manliness in this gender-neutral sense might be defined as the capacity to be unafraid of your own shadow; to be undaunted by your own dark imaginings; to whistle boldly past a quiet and un-haunted graveyard.
It's unmanly to whine about the Supreme Court because the Supreme Court is an illusion; it's done with mirrors; the image in the mirror is simply the reflection of our own belief. The Supreme Court becomes supremely unthreatening once we recognize that it simply says what it's told to say. It has, as Jackson famously observed, no power to enforce.
Oh, of course, we have real enemies -- the people who control the cops and the soldier boys. If you want to be scared of anybody, be scared of them. But don't be scared of a Punch-and-Judy show that nine prosy hirelings in an overdecorated Elks Hall put on.
Fear of the Supreme Court reflects belief in the Supreme Court, and a corresponding refusal to understand how things really work.
Now why would anybody refuse to understand?
This is surely the heart of the matter.
Comments (14)
Fadduh Smiff sez:
Of course it's the last-ditch defense of the contemptible Democrats: Dems might appoint Dracula to the Court, but Republicans would appoint Cthulhu. Aieee!
But it goes deeper. This carefully cultivated fear of pantomime villains enrages me, in part at least, because it seems unmanly...
Back during the '00 campaign, when I pointed out the utter lack of any substantive difference between the Democrats and Republicans, any Liberals within earshot would get all bent out of shape and start whining, "but... what about Roe v. Wade? Gore would appoint pro-choice Justices! What about that, huh?"
Back then, when a Liberal reacted that way, I wanted to smack the shit out of them. Luckily -- or not -- I've mellowed a bit in my middle age, and nowadays I just laugh in their faces, because I've realized that's the only response they're entitled to.
I think any Liberal who whines about the Supreme Court during this "election" should be made to wear one of those "crawling text" electric signs around their necks displaying the message I DON'T HAVE A SINGLE IDEA LEFT TO MY NAME, AND I'M PISSING MY PANTS IN SHEER TERROR.
Seriously, is that the best those doorknobs can come up with? "What about the Supreme Court?" Christ, sometimes I find myself going back to wanting to smack the shit out of them again.
Posted by Mike Flugennock | July 10, 2012 9:48 PM
Posted on July 10, 2012 21:48
OT, but here is someone not lacking in virtus (it shines through even if you can only follow snatches here and there).
Posted by sk | July 10, 2012 11:33 PM
Posted on July 10, 2012 23:33
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/10/when-a-feminist-gets-bumped-for-a-pornographer/
One Mr. Smith's favorite targets has been exposed on Counterpunch.
Posted by Boink | July 11, 2012 7:14 AM
Posted on July 11, 2012 07:14
sk
i think has found a use for a word
now used only by george Will reactionary frauds
virtue
and
i agree use the latin
virtus
to mark
the distinction in use
and to trump Willish pretension
using the latin
shields the gender slant
from the deep connotative circuitry
we anglophones
have linked to both manly
and virtuous
but we mustn't stop at that half way station
we need to press on until we find a culture that has used a neutral or a gal form
to describe this trait complex
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 9:18 AM
Posted on July 11, 2012 09:18
harry mansfield had something else in mind then father snith
he had identrified the trait complex but insisted the duty to embody this complex
remain assigned to its proper gender
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 9:20 AM
Posted on July 11, 2012 09:20
oh noooooo
demon porn !!!!
the line is crossed
we move from the problematic "ground"
of social-psychological science
to bath tub gin quality brain voodoo
look anti porn mania is strictly 20th century
now its anti obesity that raises hackles on
militant do good-ers and abolish-ers
and ban-ers
shocked sugary pinks are in
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 9:50 AM
Posted on July 11, 2012 09:50
sk,
Precisely the reason why Die Linke as a party is still under surveillance by the same Verfassungsschutz that destroyed their files on the NSU a couple of weeks ago. And in spite of her righteous manliness, Frau Wagenknecht's words fall on the deaf ears of the marionettes she mocks, including the equivalent of the US Supreme Fingerpuppets. Nevertheless, I believe she resonates with a growing minority.
Posted by davidly | July 11, 2012 3:02 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 15:02
sk
you must ee my late brother JS's
"glorious struggle vixens of der link "
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 4:16 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 16:16
btw
davidly is quoted several times
in the "export" version
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 4:18 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 16:18
d'Avidly is too modest to tell us
but
his blade unit's sharp edge
gets a big play
on the teutonic flesh-pain ciruit
these days :
"Like glans through the outer-mass, so are the graze of our knives"
Posted by op | July 11, 2012 4:25 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 16:25
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/10/when-a-feminist-gets-bumped-for-a-pornographer/
One Mr. Smith's favorite targets has been exposed on Counterpunch.
Last week, midway through a leisurely Saturday afternoon, I got an email from MSNBC asking me to be on the Melissa Harris Perry Show a week later (July 7th). I was delighted to accept, as MHP is not your usual American journalist. A professor of political science at Tulane University, she is an outspoken African American feminist and a progressive voice in a media landscape dominated by right-wing talking heads. MSNBC is a rare media oasis in the U.S. where one gets to hear some actual critical analysis...
Oh, Jesus H. Tap-Dancing CHRIST.
I need a drink. Or two. Or twelve. D'ah, screw it, just give me some heroin.
Posted by Mike Flugennock | July 11, 2012 7:31 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 19:31
Hell hath no fury like a professor scorned.
Posted by MJS | July 11, 2012 8:15 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 20:15
"Frau Wagenknecht's words fall on the deaf ears of the marionettes she mocks, including the equivalent of the US Supreme Fingerpuppets. Nevertheless, I believe she resonates with a growing minority."
Indeed. Great speech. She's part Iranian too, and it's interesting I know that but nothing else about her having never heard of her until sk's link. I wonder if she's Muslim? That would surely be used against her given today's trendy eurofascism.
Notice how it's the women in our midst with the greatest courage and integrity? Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, Bergitta Jondottir and now Ms Wagenknecht. Perhaps "virtus" should be a gender-specific word.
http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2012/wagenknecht090712.html
This is why I am against nihilism. Leaders like this deserve our support and if you really want to spite the duopoly a vote for them seems a safe way to do so. Fight the bastards everywhere, including the ballot box.
Posted by Sean | July 11, 2012 11:42 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 23:42
I wonder if she's Muslim? That would surely be used against her given today's trendy eurofascism.
I've never heard mention of her being associated with religion, as it were. Her father split when she was still a toddler.
I suppose if she or her party (let alone her fraction) were ever a real threat, someone might try to sling phony heritage at her. As it is, it's not necessary.
Not that the accusations against her aren't petty: dealing in class warfare; eating lobster; wearing her hair like Rosa Luxemburg (yet to be proved).
Oh, op, you are a caution.
Posted by davidly | July 13, 2012 12:24 PM
Posted on July 13, 2012 12:24