It's been a bad couple of weeks reading correspondence from my Lefty comrades. To begin with, the whole Ron Paul thing left nearly all of them flat-footed and empty-handed, without a useful analytical tool anywhere within reach, apart from the usual tire-iron concepts like 'racist reactionary'. Which is certainly true of Ron Paul, as it is of every other current presidential candidate, not to mention the incumbent god-emperor Himself.
Even the Lefties who thought there might be something positive to be seen in Paul's anti-imperial palaeocon constituency hastened to distance themselves from the thought of actually voting for the guy. But really, why not?
There's a lot to be said for single-issue voting. Several friends of mine are now fervent supporters of that vile Blue Dog, Andrew Cuomo, because he went all-out for single-sex marriage, and delivered, and this is an issue that matters in their lives. When I'm speaking with them and the subject comes up, my counter-arguments die on my lips. He actually did something important for them; and though I hate the guy like poison, I can't blame my friends for taking a different view.
So what are my single issues? Or at least, my two or three top issues? That's easy: war and empire and the police state. These have been my hot buttons since the year I first got laid and started taking an interest in politics, which was 1966. I think. Around then, anyway.
I'm quite close to collecting Social Security, and I will be very pissed if they take it away, but would I keep Social Security at the price of keeping the Predators droning over Afghanistan? Would you? In keeping with my respect for single-issue voting, I won't hate you if you answer 'yes'. But personally, my answer is 'no'. Your mileage may vary, but I'd be ashamed.
Comments (21)
Y'know, I commented on The Ron's rightist reactionary racist "values" in a post a little ways down; I suppose I should've pointed out then that what you said -- that is, yeah, The Ron is a racist puke, but then so are all the rest of them including The Bama in his own way -- but I figured everybody reading the thread already knew that.
I guess my main point was -- the universal racism of The Bama and the entire GOP field being beside the point -- that while Pwogs falling all over Obama in '08 was batshit enough, the bunches of Pwogs creaming themselves over Rondo in '12 have pretty much busted the Goofy Meter.
Also, I don't think the question you ask is fair to those of us on the verge -- or, in my case, the verge of the verge -- of collecting Social Security. A different choice should be posed, and not to the People, but to the politicians, and that choice should be: would you keep Social Security at the price of not having a mob string you up by your heels and use you as a piñata?
Wishful thinking, I know, but, still... c'mon, you know it really needs to happen.
Posted by Mike Flugennock | January 6, 2012 10:32 PM
Posted on January 6, 2012 22:32
I don't disagree with a word of this, Mike, except for one phrase:
That's just not happening, far as I can see. In fact even the Pwogs who do have a cautious good word to say for RP hedge it about with so many qualifications and escape clauses that it all ends up being pretty feeble. Unlike '08, when they really drank the Kool-Aid.Posted by MJS | January 6, 2012 10:41 PM
Posted on January 6, 2012 22:41
My biggest single issue is also the breaking of the American Empire, at any cost, especially if that cost falls on the American people who are actually responsible for it.
Until the insanity of imperial dreams is cured nothing else good can happen in this country. It is the root of many other evils of which we speak and a dark cloud over the rest of the world.
The question to me is who should suffer the cost of breaking the American Empire? The people of America or the people in the rest of the world? I know my answer.
Posted by Drunk Pundit | January 7, 2012 6:02 AM
Posted on January 7, 2012 06:02
Fuck this either or shit. I'm with MF. Anyone touches SS gets the full Mussolini without the benefit of being shot first.
Posted by par4 | January 7, 2012 8:31 AM
Posted on January 7, 2012 08:31
While I agree with the essence of what you're saying, I don't feel that Ron Paul (or any of the other clowns running for political office of any type, for that matter) are going to have one iota of influence on ending the American Empire.
Both parties' common interest is to preserve the status quo. True, each party seeks to dominate the other, but their shared interest is to ensure that no one upsets their apple cart.
The problem is that their apple cart is bought and paid for by the beneficiaries of the American Empire, i.e., the military industry, the financial industry, vested interests within the government Apparat, and so on.
Posted by Pied Cow | January 7, 2012 9:41 AM
Posted on January 7, 2012 09:41
Only thing Paul could do of any import (since a putative Paul Admin would never be allowed to actually stop militarizing) would be to campaign on universal guaranteed income.
And he's such a Bircher/Randian, that's like asking Obama to give up his drone love.
Posted by Jack Crow | January 7, 2012 11:25 AM
Posted on January 7, 2012 11:25
I appreciate the support for single-issue voting. Mine happens to be the Drug War, since that's where my particular ox gets gored, but that does dovetail nicely with your concern re: police state.
Explaining my Gary Johnson bumper sticker to my BHO-backing stepfather, I had this to say about that: "I'm not willing to vote for anyone who thinks I should be in jail". Pretty persuasive politics, by my lights.
I'll likely vote RP in the primary, for similar reasons.
Posted by frijoles_jr | January 7, 2012 11:31 AM
Posted on January 7, 2012 11:31
Posted by Peter Ward | January 7, 2012 4:36 PM
Posted on January 7, 2012 16:36
Thank you. I would say I have three "hot-button" issues and they are war/empire, the police state, and socio-economic justice. I would also say they are inextricably intertwined. So if I were the voting kind (like you, I'm not, except I did get a kick in 2008 from writing in Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Castro and then checking the returns for my precinct to see if they counted my vote) I guess my calculus would be similar to yours, but I would know ahead of time that anyone who advocates an end to war-empire and the police state but who at the same time doesn't seem care about social justice is either being unrealistic or else dishonest about their intentions.
Posted by Howard | January 8, 2012 12:08 AM
Posted on January 8, 2012 00:08
Oh, and one more thing. Whoever is a serious candidate for President of the U.S. is in my opinion trying out to be the next War-Criminal-in-Chief, I don't care what (s)he says.
Posted by Howard | January 8, 2012 12:11 AM
Posted on January 8, 2012 00:11
Although a member of what Auden called the Homintern, I wouldn't cut any slack for a vile politico because he happens to be not-so-bad on gay issues. There is more than one room in my foreclosed McMansion of a soul. Were I to ignore "war and empire and the police state," then I end up living in one little room, so to speak, and hope that nobody will ever bust down the door.
On the other hand, I am certainly a single-issue non-voter. If a candidate treats me and my "kind" as hate-bait, hoping to scrounge up a few extra points in the polls by doing so, then I wouldn't care a rat's hindquarters if he had an impeccable record on all other issues combined. It's a matter of self-respect.
And so on down the line for other issues. It irks me, for example, to hear women get slagged if they won't vote for a candidate "merely" on the question of abortion. Why should they? The candidate has already flunked their test; and mine, too, for that matter. And if this means voting for no one at all — well, this is no sin in the catechism of anyone here. Votes have to be earned: no one gets them by default. If no one has earned them, so be it.
Posted by antonello | January 8, 2012 7:17 PM
Posted on January 8, 2012 19:17
Antonello -- You got it exactly right I think. But I sorta thought 'homintern' was Gore Vidal, not WHA. On the other hand, it's certainly an Auden-ish coinage.
Posted by MJS | January 8, 2012 8:49 PM
Posted on January 8, 2012 20:49
Ya I go with Tony o too on the use of a vote
I really see it as a very limited expression
And the. Vanity cum sin of using it as a means of personal expression .....
Btw I like mjs line
By the call in
Sanctimaniac
Of the form
" I'm against x and i don't care who knows it"
Where x is any over certified pinko value
Including
I'm against American empire and I don't care who knows it
Posted by Op | January 9, 2012 9:37 AM
Posted on January 9, 2012 09:37
I also like the use of tire iron concept to describe most. Pinko attack lines
Especially when you are de constructing the pinkos thinker-ratus
How often do we all silly respond with some combo of tire irons
I mow I have a nice big collection
That said
I still suggest greeting a stranger with a tire iron
If the cuff so much as hints at some imminent display
Of pinko tire ironing use of feminism racism classism
That red broth caldron
Of parlor fury
The alphabet soup thing what is it
Lengthens every year or two
GLTSBQO
Btw I'm against anti questioning and I don't care who knows it
I disparage distain and despise
I'm not an organizational appendage at this sorry stage
in my peregrine pilgrimage
no matter how much I might wish otherwise
So I have the license to be an ass hole
Posted by Op | January 9, 2012 9:52 AM
Posted on January 9, 2012 09:52
The alphabet soup thing what is it
Lengthens every year or two
GLTSBQO
I can never remember it, either. It might as well be an eye chart.
Posted by antonello | January 9, 2012 11:28 PM
Posted on January 9, 2012 23:28
I get around the memory problem by attempting to recall that every human I meet is human, and may very well respond better if I keep that in mind. It's a simplistic, Golden Rule kind of thing, but...
On happy note, Ron Paul has been challenged by the only serious Democrat in the race. Vermin Supreme offered to take on him and any other contender in a variety of dignified wrestling matches.
Posted by Al Schumann | January 10, 2012 9:53 AM
Posted on January 10, 2012 09:53
The article, linked above, notes that Vermin Supreme taunted Ron Paul by playing the chicken dance through his megaphone. Fans of the Lawrence Welk show may recall the episode (a word used advisedly) in which viewers were instructed in the proper performance of the steps and articulations. "Traumatized forever...", was one viewer's response. He'd been taking acid, so that's to be expected.
Nancy Pelosi updated the dance, techno style, for the Democratic Party's 2008 convention. No one took acid for the show, as far as I can tell, but there may have been a little crystal molly making the rounds.
Posted by Al Schumann | January 10, 2012 10:37 AM
Posted on January 10, 2012 10:37
Bopping along down the video trail, George Carlin and OWS footage.
Posted by Al Schumann | January 10, 2012 11:23 AM
Posted on January 10, 2012 11:23
Al u chasten me
Every one I meet of the human kind hence forth
shall benefit from this lesson you taught me
It's all in this simple phrase change
don't do on to others as they DID on to you last time
Do on to others as they WILL DO onto you
Next time
Rational expectations
Posted by Op | January 10, 2012 1:58 PM
Posted on January 10, 2012 13:58
That's not quite it. What I have in mind is extensive benefit of the doubt and taking everything in good faith, until it's not worth the effort; at which point, call it quits if you're allowed to do so.
Posted by Al Schumann | January 11, 2012 4:18 AM
Posted on January 11, 2012 04:18
double chastened
this time for staged pomposity
not a subject for cheap mocks
except on sunday
Posted by op | January 11, 2012 12:30 PM
Posted on January 11, 2012 12:30