Should I vote for president in November?... this being a reason, If I follow, why JL's indulging himself by pulling a Dem lever is inconsequential and thus a fortiori harmless.1. My vote for president won't matter....
This line of reasoning raises several interesting questions, but the one that seems most interesting to me is the question of what collateral damage one might do by voting for a Democrat.
JL poses the question in terms of "voting for President." But suppose we pose it in terms of "voting for the Democratic Party," or even "contributing to the continued existence, in its present form, of the Democratic Party" -- because that's what, I argue, every vote for a Democrat does.
Thought experiment: If you could push a button and make the Democratic Party disappear -- would you? I would. I think we'd be better off, frankly, in a one-party state with primaries than a two-party duopoly with runoff elections -- which is what we have now. At least there'd be fewer hurdles to jump.
I dunno whether JL would push the button as cheerfully as I would, or whether he would push it at all. But perhaps posing the question helps clarify our thinking. If you wouldn't push the button -- why not? What useful purpose do you think the continued existence of the Democratic Party serves?
And if you would push the button -- then how can you justify pulling the lever?
Comments (3)
"pulling a Dem lever"? I'm certainly more subtle and wily than that.
It's true that Obama is the easy answer to my question there (though I may well change my mind before November), but actually voting for him wasn't the futile gesture I had in mind.
Posted by Jonathan Lundell | March 28, 2008 7:34 PM
Posted on March 28, 2008 19:34
Much as I usually hate to feel that I've missed the point, in this case I'm relieved.
Posted by MJS | March 28, 2008 7:38 PM
Posted on March 28, 2008 19:38
sounds like
u two oughta settle this
in a motel
Posted by op | March 31, 2008 8:34 AM
Posted on March 31, 2008 08:34