Here's cherubic little Andrew Rosenthal on the subject:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003690036
Times' editorial page editor Andy Rosenthal defended the move. Rosenthal told Politico.com shortly after the official announcement Saturday that he fails to understand “this weird fear of opposing views....We have views on our op-ed page that are as hawkish or more so than Bill....Boy, this is quite something to unpack, isn't it? Having yet another slavering mad dog on the page is fine because we already have so many. Oh, and of course the Times is "giving" Kristol a "voice" -- as if he'd been crying in the wilderness up till now.“The idea that The New York Times is giving voice to a guy who is a serious, respected conservative intellectual — and somehow that’s a bad thing,” Rosenthal added. “How intolerant is that?”
The Times is a funny outfit. The Limbaughs et al. are quite right to characterize it as a "liberal" publication, and it is that, to the marrow of its bones. Yet it has a noticeable openness to thoroughly crazy right-wing teppichfressers and their crazy ideas. Kristol on the Op-Ed page is just another chapter in the picaresque story that includes such shining moments as Judith Miller on Iraqi WMD.
I say "yet," but in fact there's no "yet" about it. The nature of liberalism is to split the difference. If you're little Pinch Sulzberger, or little Andy Rosenthal, and the spectrum of opinion you hear at Manhattan parties from loud, overbearing, well-respected, legend-in-their-own-time Sir Oracles ranges from insane to really insane, naturally you will conclude that the truth lies somewhere in between.
Reflect that the Times sits on the commanding heights of ideological formation for the American postgraduate class; imagine how hard the Kristols and their ilk work to get a foot in the door. Pinch and Andy must have these purple-faced spit-spraying loons lined up outside their offices, all the way to the elevator. I bet they can't go anywhere without being buttonholed by some Likudnik mad dog baying at the moon about how hard it is to get their "voices" heard.
So I can't really blame Pinch and Andy. And if it helps discredit the Times, well then, my hat's off to Bill Kristol.
On a more personal note, it's pure pleasure to see the son of Irving Kristol get a job from the son of Abe Rosenthal. It's very Old Testament -- The sins of the fathers are visited upon the sons.
Comments (2)
liberal press lord
diff split
i think it goes with
the occupation and its "critical path"
on one side of the fairway ...bankrupcy
on the other ......the grocery store tabs
its a battle to steer between enlightening content
and delightening content
to the market place of infotainment
zionic pan-hegemonia
of
greater and lesser nueva york
must be ..respected
the press lordos end up ...at best
with
the politics of sondheimian broadway
bill k
plays to packed audiences
as the wild man of borneo
did in barnum's simpler days
Posted by op | December 31, 2007 9:01 AM
Posted on December 31, 2007 09:01
"Reflect that the Times sits on the commanding heights of ideological formation for the American postgraduate class"
geography of same ten ...fifty... a thousand west sides
the laputan archepeligo
Posted by op | December 31, 2007 9:03 AM
Posted on December 31, 2007 09:03