In this light: mock dKos update:
"Hoo hoo hoorah, all but two Democrats in the House voted for card check class struggle." Yes, brothers and sisters of the great unorganized, the Employee Free Choice Act passed the House with flying blue colors yesterday:
http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/03/01/house-passes-employee-free-choice-act/
and will now sail into a full and final stymie as it hits the big check -- namely, the fine old aforementioned filibuster
Mr Peabody observes: "Yes, Sherman -- the cliff-hanging drama and ultimate defeat of card-check unionization -- 'twill be another instance of the grace and balance of our bicameral legislative branch. Nothing hasty, nothing rash, nothing faddish. Of course the chronic humiliation of the labor movement, splendid as that is, can't compare with the Senate's greatest historic achievement, the life-support of segregation. Why the filisbuster kept lynching alive, for an extra 30 years at least. Speaking of checks, Sherman, you might even call our legislative system a rubber check democracy."
PS: Here is a nice story of the piecard jack ass dance on this from Carter through Clinton:
http://labornotes.org/node/664
As recently as 2000 the AFL-CIO was disinclined to support labor law reform in any fashion, still smarting from the disappointment and embarrassment of the failed labor law reform push of 1977-78.This labor-led reform drive during the Carter presidency ultimately crashed on Senate rocks after winning passage in the House. Carter eventually threw in the towel on this issue, leaving labor and the reform legislation hanging.
The angry reaction of many union leaders and rank-and-file members to what was perceived as a Democratic Party failure at minimum -- and betrayal at worst -- played a part in the collapse of the Carter regime and the election of the notoriously anti-union Ronald Reagan in 1980.
Significant sections of top union officialdom resolved to never again broach the labor law reform subject and risk another electoral debacle.
In recent years, the AFL-CIO refused to seriously support labor law reform, privately fearing that it would serve only to expose Democrats who were happy to accept labor's support while doing nothing to address the labor rights catastrophe. Promotion of labor law reform by organized labor was minimal-to-non-existent throughout the Clinton years, being routinely dismissed as "unrealistic."
Comments (1)
do jobsters want
some kind of collective action option
on the job ??
yup
http://www.sharedprosperity.org/bp182.html
" About one-half the nonunion workforce in the United States desires union representation but does not have it, a union representation gap far larger than the roughly 25% to 35% gap in the other countries.
"Three-fourths of workers
desire independently
elected workplace committees
that meet and discuss issues
with management"
" (14%) are satisfied with their current voice at work and seek no changes"
" 10% are unsure about what they want."
"workers are cognizant of management hostility to collective action through unions, and that this weighs heavily in their consideration of unionizing"
Posted by owen paine | March 5, 2007 3:05 PM
Posted on March 5, 2007 15:05