The AFL-CIO is spending $40 million in 2006 and building a massive, sophisticated, voter contact and turnout program to get pro-worker candidates elected to the Senate, House and state-level offices and as governor. Some ask: Why not put all that time, energy and money into organizing drives, to increase the size, and therefore power, of our unions?Oddly, "pro-worker candidates" seems to mean Democrats, though the word doesn't appear even once in the piece....unions must participate in politics and work to elect legislators who will protect our freedom to form unions. We cannot believe in the false dichotomy of organize or politicize.
Let me say if your idea of class politics starts and stops with feeding one or the other head of Orthrus -- i.e. playing two-party politics -- for my buck, you suck, chief.
Tot up the money spills of our august house of labor and you get this lame donk echo.
Like the pwog dance on the supreme court's evil clout, that tewwible destroyer of civil liberty, jobsters face the national labor relations board, the executioner of toilers' dreams, destroyer of all organizing abilities, etc. Inference: elect donks today and they'll appoint yer pals to these key star chamber seats.
Lesser claims:
We pay to help the people of our sovereign states choose gubners that let public workers strike. We also pay candidates that will do their level damnedest to repeal all anti-union state laws. Bottom line: we can buy you a gubmint, with your dues, that will make it 1937 all over again.
Sum up: Forty million dues dollars for Rahm Emanuel and St Hill.
Down with the Sweeney machine! Movement politics si! Party politics no! -- and organizing a job site action -- el supremo!
Comments (1)
In addition to grievances, every revolution needs a vision. Total social inclusion is mine.
Education, healthcare, and work for everyone. Paid for by restitution of everything this Congress and White House have stolen from us.
Posted by Spartacus O'Neal | August 31, 2006 11:47 AM
Posted on August 31, 2006 11:47