It's the illustrious Mr. Y.
"So, JS, what say you? A shabby-ass cease fire -- quite a denouement."
He's calling me? As if i'm the oracle, not him. What a transparent ploy. But no, I won't ask his take, the egomaniac. Instead i go "Errrrrrrrr... indeed... exactly... good point... all I dare add is thank God uncle's got too fucking few boots, eh?"
Bzzzzzz... and he's gone.
I guess if you boil it all together long enough, that is the empire's final bone, and consequently its weakest link -- the footsoldiers, the grunts and jarheads. The ultimate smart weapon system is mostly made of meat. There's no substitute when you get to the short strokes.
Forget the cruise missile phase of wardom -- lesson from Iraq and reinforced by Lebanon: no more sky-hawkery. Hillary et al. want to give Uncle precisely more "boots", so he can get in there on the ground and rumble.
So who's the fightin-er party, gang? That corporate profiteers' grappler Don Rummy with his shock and awe blitzkrieg update and its minimalist ground force concepts, or Hilary, no longer the bomber-borne saint of Kosovo -- Hillary, who now has a new mystical inspiration: "We need lots more brigades ready to hit the beach -- lots and lots...."
Don Rummy is content with more hi-tech weapon systems, but our lady of the mano-a-mano wants tens of thousands more hard-ass regular forces flesh puppets.
Then what? Two, three, maybe more armed civilizin' projects going on at once? Hill and hubby Bill wanna create a chain of decent-acting emerging nation states all across this globe of ours. Build 'em from scratch out of the hundred or so post-cold war and post-colonial shambles we got lying around the planet. They're much bigger thinkers than old jackass Jimmy -- Carter only builds houses for the poor, but St Hill and her man Bill are fixin' to build whole civilized nations for 'em, and with the help of enough armed missionaries, who can say its just a dream?
Comments (3)
Well then I guess she is an idiot. Boots on the ground is indeed the achilles heel of the duo-empire. Americans won't die in war and this latest denoument proved Israelis have more to live for than Americans. Shias, on the other hand, live to die in war and they have better demographics.
In '79 they discovered that religious fundamentalism is the indestructible organizing principle of the new caliphate and now they have the order of battle.
Posted by Anonymous | August 15, 2006 2:41 PM
Posted on August 15, 2006 14:41
I know this post is curdled with ironies, but I must point out that Clinton (Bill) was the first to be seduced by war from the air. Wesley Clark, Clinton's stalking horse in the 2004 democratic primaries, bragged about how he destroyed Yugoslavia without any American casualties.
I agree with anonymous, above, that Americans (white middle class level) are relucatant to "die in war", but Iraq is showing that there are alternatives -- jobless minorities, and central Americans trying to earn citizenship. And, of course, private contractors.
Emmanuel Todd, in End of Empire, describes the "achilles heel of Empire" succinctly -- we have no moral authority any more (no one believes our "democracy") and our military can only destroy countries, not occupy them.
Posted by bobw | August 16, 2006 12:45 PM
Posted on August 16, 2006 12:45
"Clinton (Bill) was the first to be seduced by war from the air. Wesley Clark, Clinton's stalking horse in the 2004 democratic primaries, bragged about how he destroyed Yugoslavia without any American casualties"
yes but thats the old new democrat line
the new new democrat line
is more boots
precedent the kennedy camelot round table
recall
flexible response
jfk 's
version of "bring it on"
was something about
how uncle was prepared to bear
"any burden "
ie
fight
two and one half
counter insurgencies at once
no more red guerilla wins in asia
that was pure ring a ding ding
swinger era donkey do
as gore vidal sez
the new frontier turned out to be
vietnam
and the wheels came off the cart
Posted by js paine | August 16, 2006 8:04 PM
Posted on August 16, 2006 20:04