But of course, the hee haw gang are loyal fans of the greater humanist empire -- so forget any idea they might draw the party line right there where it would indeed be a real honest choice -- something like this:
"We are for security here at home -- they are for maximum penetration over there . You choose, America -- stick with the elephants and make the third world world safer for transnational adventures, and your own back yard tomorrow's walk-up bomb site -- or bring the troops all back home, forget gunpoint overseas profiteering, and make us poor liittle American weebles more safe and less sorry.
Comments (5)
Of course I agree (as I always do) . . . but I do have a question:
Given the fact that our military forces are trained to concentrate on "policing" and "killing"; given the fact that they have lowered their recruitment standards to now include criminals and the mentally ill; given the fact that greater than a third of combat veterans return to domestic life with severe mental illness, poorly treated and supported by the V.A., do we not need to be very careful here? Remember, these are all volunteers who joined the military to fight for a certain concept that does not exist. Many of them see folks like you and me as as much of an enemy as al Qaida. These ain't Swiss Army vets.
I don't want these folks "protecting" me back in the states unless I'm sure they've been thoroughly re-evaluated, retrained, and re-socialized. I honor their courage and dedication, but they scare the shit out of me.
Posted by ddjango | March 31, 2006 7:54 AM
Posted on March 31, 2006 07:54
I honestly do not see us getting out of Iraq short of a total revolt here at home, since I'm sure the political ruling class views a major civil war in the Middle East as a potential and real threat to the oil supplies on which our economy and imperial machine wholly depend. Our dependency on oil is rather frightening really, given the fact that everything we know and take for granted is based on a platform of cheap, abundant petroleum. If that platform were to collapse, the politicians know what would happen: economic depression and mass rioting.
Posted by Tim D | March 31, 2006 9:33 AM
Posted on March 31, 2006 09:33
hey dd
lets bring em home anyway
dangerous or not
their ours
so they poison
the social liver somewhat
don't
"we" citizens
deserve at least
that amount of blow back ?
besides
their bucket of blood and beer type shenanigans
will be
"as
a thousand points of light ...."
blinking
the message:
here sprawls
the result
of
one low life
spent
in the imperial
fast lane
Posted by jsp | March 31, 2006 10:49 AM
Posted on March 31, 2006 10:49
I'm tempted to be cynical and say that they can always find suitable jobs in the booming incarceration sector. But that would be far too flippant.
One way or another they're coming home anyway, and the longer they spend "over there", and the more of 'em spend time "over there", the worse off we'll be -- no?
Posted by MJS | March 31, 2006 11:05 AM
Posted on March 31, 2006 11:05
on second thought dd
i better change my stance some
see the real me
kinda likes
the sort
of preterated soul
drawn from the back desks
of high school
and pap's
drunken bombast
to a stretch in the armed services
exhibit A :
that legendary
civil libertarian
larry flynt
not all killers
wanna be cops
some have a fine robin hood
outlaw streak
sure enough
the american legion
is a petty
corporate goon squad
but my bet
those legion boys
with the french fry hats
were the mp's
in baden baden
and the carolina
boot camp
under-ware distributors
not the actual
e3 grunts from
hell patrol 13
Posted by jsp | March 31, 2006 3:44 PM
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:44