Question one : are any of Rahm's rangers as yet worried at all about a base rebellion next fall?
Have they noticed the possibility that a revulsion from this do-nothing approach might hit their zombie candidates so hard at the polls, come November, as to spoil all hopes for a return to majority status?
Has it occurred to anybody that the present "planned power off" strategy -- make no blunders, it's all down hill anyway, so let's coast -- won't hack it over all the humps out there up ahead? Has it crossed anybody's mind that the voters might want to hear something more than tut-tutting and insincere protestations of shock about corruption and spying -- that they might want to hear about the big positive beef-with-thick-gravy issues, like Iraq, one-payer health, high-wage jobs?
We know by deduction what's up -- nothing. But have they all drunk the Rahm and Hillary Kool-Aid? Or is there discontent in the ranks, kept out of the public eye by the masters of the campaign-money spigot?
Comments (2)
I've been looking at the websites of Democratic challengers to vulnerable Republicans and you can always instantly pick out the Rahm Emanuel recruits. Many are actual Republicans and almost NONE discuss any issues on their sites. They all support the middle-class and the troops. That's it. Rahm Emanuel engineered NAFTA in the 90s and it looks like he could be the only person who could engineer a Republican victory in 2006!
Posted by DownWithTyranny | January 30, 2006 2:41 AM
Posted on January 30, 2006 02:41
dwt:
nice indeed
rahm is the very essence of all we here at "stop me"
wish to ....cast into outer darkness
Posted by jsp | January 30, 2006 2:58 PM
Posted on January 30, 2006 14:58