« Deluge or delusion | Main | Democrats with machine guns (and knives in their back) »

And... we have a Hunger Chancellor!

By Michael J. Smith on Friday October 14, 2005 10:19 AM

A few days ago I explained elsewhere why I think the Republicans will happy to hand over the store in 2008 to a Democratic "Hunger Chancellor." There's no shortage of Democratic applicants for the job, but now we have one who appears to have accepted the Republican nomination as Democratic candidate, namely Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico.

The New York times today reports that Richardson will traveling on an Air Force plane to North Korea in order to browbeat Strange Leader Kim Jong Il about his nuclear program. It's official, it's not official, he's an envoy, he's a private citizen -- nobody understands it, but whether he manages to achieve anything or not it will help the Republicans in '06: if he succeeds Bush will take the credit and if he fails Bush will blame the stupid Democrat.

Richardson's fellow Democrats are presumably gnashing their teeth over this stunt, which may possibly bolster Richardson's chances of being the nominee in '08 at the expense of the party's prospects in '06.

But nobody ever gets excommunicated from the Democratic Party, for anything. Will Rogers' comment that "I don't belong to an organized political party -- I'm a Democrat" is true in a much deeper sense than he intended. The Democratic Party isn't really a party at all, in the sense of being an organization with a political program and some modicum of party discipline. Rather, it is a loose collective of individual opportunists, an ad hoc camel train of unconnected entrepreneurs temporarily banded together against desert marauders, owing each other no loyalty and in fact perfectly willing to stab each other in the back first chance they get.

People who write software have an old joke: when you tell them about something strange their program is doing, they reply, That's not a bug, it's a feature! Even so with the Democrats: their lack of principle, their not being about anything, is not a flaw; rather, it's their essence, the very life blood and raison d'etre of the outfit.


Comments (1)

"Stop Me..." writes:

"Even so with the Democrats: their lack of principle, their not being about anything, is not a flaw; rather, it's their essence, the very life blood and raison d'etre of the outfit..."

I'm sure glad somebody else is noticing this. I can remember in the '02 off-year elections, the question I kept hearing in the media, even as the Jackasses were handing a blank check over for Dubya's War, was "what are the Democrats about?"...after which I and many others could come up with only one answer -- NOTHING.

Ever since then, at every opportunity, I've referred to the Democrats as The Seinfeld Party.

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Friday October 14, 2005 10:19 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Deluge or delusion.

The next post in this blog is Democrats with machine guns (and knives in their back).

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31